In-house Systems vs. SaaS AP Solutions White Paper

Home > ASPEN 360 > Accounts Payable Edition > White Paper

ASPEN 360 Accounts Payable Edition Accounts Payable: In-house Systems vs SaaS Solutions White Paper

Today, Imaging and Workflow Automation (IWA) technologies are finding increasing acceptance with accounts payable professionals as a means to strengthen controls, drive out costs, and increase efficiencies throughout the invoice receipt-to-pay cycle.

This document provides a comprehensive analysis of the costs and risks associated with in-house IWA systems compared to Software-as-a-Service solutions.

Upon completion of the short questionnaire below, the In-House vs. Software-as-a-Service Cost & Risk Analysis will be immediately sent to your email address. Note that all fields are required.

Important: Our organization respects your privacy and does not sell/trade contact information.

Step 1: Contact Information
* First Name		* Last Name
* Job Title		* Company
* Phone Number		* Email Address
* Street Address		* City
* State		* Zip Code

Step 2: Quick Survey (completion required)
* How many paper-based invoices do you process per month?
* How many A/P processors are in your department?
* Are you currently utilizing any imaging and workflow technology?
If yes what system?